As a result of a few bad apples, the mortgage broker industry has been plagued with doubt. Entrepreneurs may wish to sit out the controversy until the problems resulting from the subprime lending crisis are resolved.
“The industry is under scrutiny in Washington and state capitols (sic) because rogue brokers have been accused of contributing to the spike in mortgage defaults and foreclosures, by encouraging borrowers to take risky loans and by charging excessive fees,” according to an article in The Wall Street Journal last year.
Mortgage brokers are also among the most common suspect occupations associated with mortgage fraud, along with other finance-related occupations, such as accountants and lenders, according to a 2007 report by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Because allegations of mortgage fraud are on the rise—Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) from financial institutions increased by 31 percent during 2007—consumers may be more be inclined to shop for home loans directly as a precautionary measure.
Borrowers may find that working directly with lending institutions is more practical and cost-effective. Tighter lending conditions have considerably reduced the range of options that were once available, and nearly all loan programs now conform to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac guidelines. Consequently, borrowers may not require a mortgage broker’s services in reviewing their options. Furthermore, cutting out a broker’s “middleman” role may result in better deals between lenders and borrowers, who mutually save on the commissions they would otherwise be paying.
Click here for full story